|
Note: To cut and paste from this site, paste directly into your blank
outgoing e-mail or word processing document. For e-mail, because of
different formatting features of various e-mail services, you may need
to make some adjustments to the "pasted" version. Contact us if you
have problems.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Current actions
listed include:
SAAF Action 04-08 Support Aid and Security Funding SAAF Action 03-08 Support the International Criminal Court SAAF Action 02-08 Sent letter to Chinese Ambassador to U.N. SAAF Action 02-07 Bring Genocide into the Presidential Race
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SAAF Action 04-08
May 5, 2008
Support Humanitarian Aid and Security
Funding for Sudan
Recently, the United Nations
World Food Program announced that it will cut half its food supplies to
the people of Darfur because of a lack of funds and relentless attacks
on its convoys. Millions of Darfuris depend on this food supply.
Without it, they will be pushed even closer to edge of starvation.
Congress is preparing to vote on a bill that will
significantly increase funding for humanitarian aid and peacekeeping in
Darfur. Your representative needs to hear from you. Please write to
your Representative and tell him or her to support funding for security
and humanitarian aid in Darfur.
Additional funding for Darfur can bring hope to the
thousands who have weathered half a decade of genocide. It can provide
peacekeepers with training and equipment to protect Darfuri civilians.
It can deliver disaster and famine assistance to families desperately in
need.
Click
HERE
to tell your member of Congress that we must meet our obligation to the
people of Darfur. Urge your representative to fully fund peacekeeping
and humanitarian aid to Darfur.
With the United Nations World Food Program cutting
its food aid to Darfur, the clock is ticking faster and louder than ever
– action must be taken quickly to try to fill this crucial gap.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SAAF
Action 03-08
February 28, 2008
Wanted for War Crimes
A large coalition of organizations has
joined to support the action of Aegis Trust in attempting to get the
United Nations Security Council to increase its effort to bring two
Sudanese men to court who have been indicted by the International
Criminal Court for murder, rape and wanton destruction. While SAAF has
not joined this coalition, we do support the action.
Please take the action by clicking below.
If you do not wish to receive future
e-mail from that group, click "No thank you" just before the "Send"
button
Action: Wanted for War Crimes
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SAAF Action 02-08
February 14, 2008
Letter to Ambassador Wang Guangya
Below, you will find a letter
to the Chinese Ambassador to the United Nations. Please cut, paste,
adjust it to fit your situation, and mail it to Ambassador Wang Guangya.
China took some very modest helpful steps last year,
but they have not improved conditions on the ground in Darfur. In fact,
the humanitarian and security situation has deteriorated dramatically in
recent months, and Sudan has obstructed the deployment of UNAMID to such
a degree that it is now entirely unclear whether it can ever be
successful. Beyond that, China has been silent while Khartoum has
resisted implementing key provisions of the North-South peace agreement,
provided support to the Ugandan rebel Lord's Resistance Army, and
contributed to the recent attempt to overthrow the Chadian government by
arming and supporting Chadian rebels.
The time for patience with Khartoum is long past gone. Ongoing violence
in Sudan and the region, and the fate of millions of displaced
Darfurians, demand otherwise.
Perhaps alone among the world's nations,
China has the political and economic leverage to change Khartoum's
course in Darfur. Please encourage them to do so by sending the letter
below.
-----------------------
| [Date] Ambassador Wang Guangya
Permanent Representative of China to the United Nations
350 East 35th St
New York City, NY 10016
Your Excellency:
China's influence with the Government of Sudan is unparalleled among
nations. We are writing to urge you to publicly apply pressure on
Khartoum to meet its legal obligation to allow the full deployment
of the United Nations-African Union hybrid peacekeeping force (UNAMID)
in Darfur, per Security Council Resolution 1769.
The Government of Sudan is obstructing the deployment of UNAMID
peacekeepers in at least five ways:
 | The government has failed to give formal approval to the list
of UNAMID troop contributions for more than three months.
|
 | The government has rejected troop units from Nepal, Thailand
and Nordic countries, insisting that they will only accept African
contributions, even though there are no alternatives that are
ready to deploy.
|
 | The government has taken months to allocate land for UNAMID
bases in Darfur.
|
 | The government has attempted to assert control over UNAMID's
operations by insisting that provisions be included in the Status
of Forces Agreement that would allow it to temporarily disable
UNAMID's communications network when the government undertakes "security operations", and that would require UNAMID to give
Sudanese authorities advance notification of all movements of
troops and equipment.
|
 | The government has refused to give UNAMID forces permission to
fly at night and continues to impose curfews on peacekeepers in
certain areas.
|
These obstructionist tactics contradict both the
letter and spirit of Resolution 1769 and are unacceptable. When the
Security Council unanimously passed Resolution 1769, you stated that "Today's resolution is only the first step towards full settlement
of the Darfur issue. The next key step is to faithfully implement
it." The government of Sudan has gone to great lengths to thwart
Resolution 1769's implementation through baseless objections,
procrastination and downright stalling. All of this has occurred
while the lives of millions of Darfuris continue to hang in the
balance. Indeed, the government of Sudan's hostility toward UNAMID
peacekeepers reached a new level on January 7, when Sudanese army
troops opened fire on a UNAMID convoy in Darfur. As a permanent member of the Security Council
with a close relationship with the Government of Sudan, the Chinese
government has a particular ability and responsibility to ensure
that Resolution 1769 is fully implemented. Therefore, we urge you to
publicly apply pressure on the government of Sudan to stop
obstructing the full deployment of UNAMID troops and adhere to all
of its legal obligations under Resolution 1769. Should the
government of Sudan continue to evade its legal obligations under
Resolution 1769, we urge you support the implementation of targeted
Security Council sanctions on key Sudanese government officials,
including President Omar Al-Bashir. Sincerely, [Your
name]
[Your address]
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SAAF Action 01-08
January 1,
2008
China and the Olympics
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SAAF
Action Request 02-07
Bring the genocide to the forefront of the
Presidential race
This request asks you to get
involved politically on behalf of a peace for Sudan. An extensive
background is provided followed by the specific action request. The
background is provided so that you will feel comfortably prepared for
the action. If you do not need the background, go directly to the
ACTION item.
BACKGROUND
After four years, the conflict in Darfur,
an area about the size of Texas, has resulted in the deaths of an
estimated 400,000 to 500,000 people and the forced removal of about 2.5
million from their homes into refugee camps in neighboring countries or
squalid internal displacement camps inside Sudan, most near the larger
towns and cities of Darfur. The victims are Sudanese. The perpetrators
are Sudanese.
In 2003, rebels from indigenous African
tribes in Darfur attacked government military installations hoping to
correct the ills caused by many years of neglect by the central
government. Rather than limit its response to the rebel combatants, the
government of Sudan, in concert with the Janjaweed militia, adopted a
scorched-earth policy against the civilian population. The actions of
the government of Sudan and its Janjaweed allies appropriately have been
labeled genocide by the United States.
A November 2006 report by U.N. High
Commissioner for Human Rights, Louise Arbour of events in a refugee camp
in West Darfur illustrates the situation: “7,000 people fled the area
[of the attacks]. Several witnesses described seeing cold-blooded
killings of children when the attackers ransacked villages, including a
woman whose four-year-old was pulled from her grasp and shot dead.
Another group of three children (five, seven and nine years-old) were
running in line. The five-year old fell down and was shot dead. One of
the attackers reportedly told a boy who pleaded with him: ‘If I let you
go then you will grow up.’ The boy was then shot, the report said.”
The current phase of the genocide involves
violence directed at the populations within camps for displaced
persons. Men are being gunned down, children clubbed and burned to
death, and women gang-raped. This is the latest chapter in a continuing
history of genocide in Sudan. How can we understand such
brutality, such disregard for human life, and such depravity? Who are
those who use genocide as strategy?
Sudan gained independence in 1956. Control
of the country has been in the hands of a small group of members of
Arabic tribes living along the Nile River near Khartoum. Under their
reign, Sudan has been at war with itself for all but 10 years. The last
period of peace ended in 1982. Since then about 2.75 million Sudanese
citizens have been killed directly or through engineered starvation,
dehydration and disease. Almost a quarter of the population have been
driven from their homes and denied a means of survival. On
average about 10,000 Sudanese per month die from the government’s
genocidal strategy.
Power and wealth always have been
concentrated in these few Arabic tribes who control the nation. Sudan is
controlled by a few well-educated, intellectually capable, radically
committed men who are members of the National Congress Party. They rule
through military dictatorship. Regardless of their ethnic, religious, or
cultural identity, population groups on the periphery of power remain
marginalized, largely destitute, and lacking development.
Sudan’s President Omar al Bashir has been
in power since 1989. Because of his ongoing deadly human-rights abuses
in Darfur, he has for two years running been acknowledged the World’s
Worst Dictator by “Parade Magazine.” Lust for power, greed,
racism, culture, and religious zealotry all are part of the motivation
for Bashir and his genocidaires in Khartoum.
What can the nations of the world do?
Responses fall into three categories: Diplomatic (political
negotiations), Economic (sanctions and other pressure), and Military.
Roger Winter, Former Special Representative on Sudan to the Secretary of
State, testified before the House Committee on Foreign Affairs
Subcommittee on Africa that in the seventeen years since they came to
power by an illegal coup, these Sudanese leaders have consistently
defied the international community and won. Mr. Winter
identified the key to moving the leaders of Sudan as posing a credible
threat to their power and wealth.
What are the nations doing? The African Union has a military force
operating in
Darfur with the task of performing peacekeeping operatieons related to
the conflict. About 7,000 strong, the force is too small, inadequately
equipped, and does not have a strong mandate to protect the civilian
population—nor is there a peace to monitor. The force is largely
ineffective. Not a credible threat to their power and wealth.
What are we doing? The
United Nations has passed 8 resolutions condeming the violence in
Darfur, none of which has stopped the genocide. The U.N. is limited by
the self interest of its component nations. For example, China is the
dominant trading partner with Sudan and buys the great bulk of the oil
extracted in Sudan; Russia is a primary supplier of weapons to the
Government of Sudan. As permanent members of the Security Council, both
Russia and China have “veto power.” Although the Security Council
approved sending a force of about 22,000 troops into Darfur, the United
Nations seems unwilling to dispatch such a force without the approval of
the Government of Sudan! Not a credible threat to their power
and wealth.
What are we doing?
European nations seem willing to be observers. Professor Eric
Reeves stated it well,
“Rhetorical performance is robust in some
quarters, but, despite Europe’s diplomatic, economic, and military
power—and its own experience with genocide over the last century—there
is no indication that Europe is considering any commensurate action…we
are learning, yet again, that some genocides matter more than others.
And, from the perspective of Europe, Darfur just doesn’t measure up.”
(The New Republic (on-line), October 27, 2006) Not a credible
threat to their power and wealth.
What are we doing? The United States has done
more than any other nation or entity. We have given humanitarian aid to
save the people of Sudan, sponsored forceful resolutions in the United
Nations, and prohibited U.S. companies from doing business with Sudan.
Sudan is listed on the State Department’s list of state sponsors of
terrorism. The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) and other churches have
joined in the efforts to provide humanitarian aid. Citizens are urging
university, church and state retirement programs to divest from foreign
companies doing business with Sudan that supports the violence. All are
important steps. But just as important is what we have not done. We have
not denied companies doing business with the government
of Sudan access to our capital markets and not
prevented Sudanese leaders who are complicit in genocide from coming to
this country. We are not willing to commit U.S.
military forces to Darfur to stop the genocide. We, along with
the rest of the world, have not posed a credible threat to the power and
wealth of the leaders Sudan.
What then can WE do?
“Nothing” is not an answer for Christians. Jesus tells us quite clearly
that what we do for our brothers and sisters is what we do for Him. With
equal clarity, He tells us that neglecting our brothers and sisters is
the same as neglecting Him. It will not do for us to say, “I knew about
the genocide in Sudan, but I decided not to get involved.”
And so we pray
and give. We participate in groups such as the Sudan Advocacy Action
Forum. We consider our own investments.
ACTION REQUEST
Remembering that the idea is to provide a
credible threat to the wealth and power of the Sudanese leadership,
another step is before us. We must
bring the genocide to the forefront of the Presidential race.
When Presidential candidates of any party
visit your area, go to the meetings and ask questions—not about policy
but about action! If the candidates do not visit your area, write to
them. Write letters to the editor, encouraging others to pose such
questions.
Ask questions like:
 | Over the past 17 years, the controlling party in Sudan has ignored
international concern about its inhumane internal actions except when
the leaders have feared loss of power and wealth. What specific
economic measures will you use to stop the genocide in Darfur?
|
 | Both the
U.S. Congress and the President have labeled the conflict in Darfur
genocide. That determination, which certainly is accurate, imposes
a responsibility to protect the victims. How will you protect the
threatened citizens of Darfur?
|
 | The State Department lists Sudan as a state sponsor of
terrorism. What specific measures will you take to put an end to
terrorism in Darfur sponsored by the Government of Sudan? |
 | There can be no peace in Darfur without peace in all of Sudan.
How will you assure that the Comprehensive Peace Agreement is
implementd? |
Persist. Don’t accept “policy”
answers. Demand “action” answers. The media will report these events and
the candidate’s response. The genocidairres in Sudan will listen. If we
become involved and push for action, we can help create a credible
threat to their power and wealth that may lead to peace for the people
of Darfur.
With your help, we CAN!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|